L0039_2016_09_26

L: Good day.

Q: Greetings my friend. I’m pleased to be participating with this experience and a lot of people asking questions and reading the information that you have offered and really really absorbing it and appreciating it.

L: I am very pleased to be interacting with yourself as well.

Q: I think that we’ll begin with what Nuno was telling me, that you had actually some information to offer to us in relation to the nature of this dimension, the purpose of this dimension and how the Shift will affect that. And so I will sit and listen like everyone else.

L: Very well. Your physical dimension, this dimension that you are currently participating in, was designed like many other such dimensions for a particular purpose, the purpose being to generate experiences for individuals that participate in it and each dimension has its own character, that is the experiences individuals acquire in engaging a dimension are unique to each dimension.

Now in your particular dimension there are certain aspects which are, shall we say, a theme and one of those themes would be the exploration of sexuality, another theme would be the exploration of emotional states and expression of emotion.

Now with your shift in consciousness you are not so much altering the basic character of the dimension as it is more a matter of enabling yourselves to perceive more of yourself and how you participate in the world and the reason for this change, this shift in consciousness, is that to a large degree you have exhausted the experiences that you can derive in its current configuration. Many of the experiences in the present timeframe and in recent timeframes are variations on themes that have been expressed in previous times, therefore your shift in consciousness will open avenues of exploration which you have denied yourself collectively and this will be done by increasing your awareness and increasing your understanding of how you generate your experience.

Now a lot of the information I have been expressing recently regarding how you generate your experience with your perception and how you influence that, this information is intended to give you a wider perspective on what you may consider possible, what you may consider viable and realistic. I have expressed that there are no limitations, that you are capable of generating whatever experience you wish, and this is correct.

However the important aspect of these physical dimensions are what I call the core beliefs, which provide the dimension with its framework. And these core beliefs are extremely prominent in that it is not a simple matter to disengage from them. Let me provide an example: your belief in gravity in your dimension, as you can tell, is quite fundamental. You are very aware that if you release an object in midair it will fall to the ground and you have known this since your birth and there are very few individuals which have experienced otherwise. And I am not referring to what you have achieved with your technologies, with your spaceships and experiences outside of your earth, I am referring to your experiences on your planet.

Now suppose then you wish to generate an experience in which you levitate, and this can be accomplished, and indeed individuals have accomplished this. However it is quite a challenging task because of the nature of that belief in gravity.

Now the reason I am mentioning this is because many individuals find a kind of contradiction between on one hand the statement that you can create your perception and cause it to generate your experience any way you wish and on the other hand when they attempt to apply this knowledge in a specific area they find difficulty perhaps, perhaps great difficulty, and at this point they may begin to doubt or discount that they do indeed completely create their experience, for they feel they are not able to put into practice that aspect of their reality, and the reason for this is that in many cases a great many beliefs are involved.

In this, I have said beliefs provide the fundamental structure for your dimension and other dimensions, they are the framework for it. And while my example of gravity is an extreme in that, because of its extremely basic component of your reality, the other beliefs which are perhaps not so core are also extremely well established and most of you do not realize the extent to which you engage these beliefs. It is not apparent to you and if you do realize that the beliefs are there and that you engage them you perhaps underestimate how compelling they are to your perception. For example, returning to the gravity, because it is such a core belief, your perception is drawn strongly to that belief, very strongly.

So in this a course that you may wish to follow in experimenting with the flexibility of your perception is to work with your beliefs, particularly the strong ones, in the sense that you recognize them and you make allowances for. For if you have a strong belief and you are engaging it, it will be almost impossible for you to violate that belief. You may to some extent push against it, however the experience you would generate in this manner would usually not be the experience you wish to create for the belief and its strong influence distorts and alters your intent.

Now this is not to say that you cannot achieve much more than you are currently achieving in terms of creating your reality. It is merely a comment on how powerful your beliefs are and how important it is to realize that you engage these and how influencing they are and that it is necessary for you to either disengage the belief, which can be challenging, or flow around the belief which in many cases is possible. Flowing around the belief would mean creating experiences that do not necessarily violate your beliefs but take advantage of the flexibility you do have.

Q: Like jumping from an airplane?

L: Yes, like jumping from an airplane.

Q: With a parachute (laughs)

L: With a parachute. I would not suggest you do that without a parachute.

Q: Ah, good advice!

L: Although individuals have done this and survived.

Q: Ah. You mean when you flow around the belief you kind of minimize the opposition or minimize, not the fear but how it would affect if you disengaged it completely...kind of minimizing, yeah, I understand.

L: Very good.

Q: You say the beliefs distort and alter the intent. This means that basically all of our intents would basically include the beliefs, they are altered…
Anything that we would plan would be from past knowledge or what we have believed all our lives and we wouldn’t actually generate a new intent without first looking at the beliefs, to be able to create a new intent.

L: The intent itself is not altered by the belief, what the belief does is cause your perception to move in a direction that is divergent from your intent, and you then have a situation in which your intent is wanting to move you in a particular direction…

Q: And the belief in time would put it into the future in a timeline, like “This could take 6 months. This is reasonable.” Is that what you mean?
L: No, the belief then is pulling in a different direction and the result, the resulting experience that your perception generates will be in neither of those directions, it will be a blend of what your belief is dictating and where your intent wishes to go. And what you would experience in such a situation, which is quite common, would be an experience in which you did not generate the experience you wanted, or you would perhaps consider that you had failed, it would be something of that nature.

Q: Yeah.

L: Now, did you have further questions on this?

Q: No, it’s very clear actually. It’s a good clarification. Would you like to continue about flowing around the beliefs?

L: One other aspect about the shift in your consciousness and how this will be affecting your dimension is that it may appear that with this increasing awareness and knowledge you would be able to create what Elias has referred to as utopia, and as he has said that is not correct, that is not the direction you are moving in. One of the reasons for this is that that would fundamentally change the purpose of your dimension and fundamentally change the character of the experience which can be derived in it, and this is not necessary, for there are other dimensions which provide those kind of experiences. Therefore at the completion of the shift the world will seem in some respects quite different but in other respects it will still be familiar. This is to say that individuals will still engage in processes in order to achieve certain goals, your belief in processes is also fundamental to your dimension, and your expanded awareness will have its greatest influence in areas of technology, where you will consider areas of exploration which perhaps you have not, and as I have said your social systems, your governments. And of course individuals change significantly, for individuals will have a much stronger sense of their interconnectedness and also their power within themselves to experience their lives more in line with their choosing. There will not be feelings of being victimized or perceptions that other individuals are forcing situations upon them that they do not choose.

These will be the most significant changes, it would not be like you can begin to manifest glorious cities and great wealth and great magnificent aspects magically. You will accomplish these things in a more conventional manner, as you do today, it is more a matter of the ease with which you accomplish. Are you understanding?

Q: Yes. Interesting. It seems like, that, the cooperation that will be inherent as a result of the interconnectedness will generate a lot more ability to build these bigger feats of design and it’s the cooperation that would be key, I suppose, and the interconnectedness, more understanding. Things can get done faster, and more complex...there will be that ability for society to actually be more complex in what they are creating and inventing. Yes, it’s clear. Very clear.

L: Very well, yes. This element of interconnectedness, as you mentioned, is quite significant, for with that realization much of what today is competitiveness will no longer exist.

Q: Exactly. Because there is an understanding that it’s all one flow of consciousness experiencing itself from different points of view, like facets of a diamond.

L: That is correct.

L: Now, do you have any questions of your own?

Q: In relation to this topic? No, this is very clear. Would you like to continue with this topic or would you like to open to more questions in other directions?

L: You may proceed with your own questions.

Q: Well, obviously we are shifting and changing. I discussed with Nuno that there are a lot of people that are talking about changes in energy centers and changes in DNA structure--the strands. There is a lot of conflicting information, so perhaps you would offer us some clarity in that regard and what we can expect in relation to the Shift and changes that we are actually going through right now, and what we can expect in regards to how that would affect us as functioning as physical beings. Is my question clear?
L: Yes.

Q: Thank you.

L: Now in this the changes to your physical representation in a dimension, which is primarily your physical bodies and your body consciousness, many aspects of that, in other words your biological composition and in fact the biological composition of all species in your dimension, are quite fundamental to your dimension, meaning that they are part of its framework and there will not be very significant changes in that. The biological underpinnings for your planet will remain essentially the same.

However with regard to your own physical representation in the dimension, some changes will occur, changes that are related to your expansion. For as you are aware certain energy centers within your body are more concerned with subjective aspects of yourself than others, in a sense they all are concerned with subjective aspects of yourself, but some more so and your physical representation will change in that you will become more receptive to information that you would call intuitive, you would become more receptive to information from sources outside your dimension, as well as information concerning other individuals. In other words your connectedness will be more apparent to you. And these changes will affect your energy centers and will have an effect on your physical body as well in terms of, for example, health, but your fundamental biological structure will not change. You may continue.

Q: Well, I have noticed for example that I’ve been for the past year drinking excessive amounts of water and a lot of people have reported that, and I haven’t been able to eat meat. I haven’t eaten meat for a couple of years. There are a lot of people who physically feel different so an addition to that question would be what would be the correlation between the DNA structure, the cellular structure, and the changes that are happening with the energy centers? Are we adding energy centers? Are we altering or exchanging them for new ones? What exactly can you offer at this point in relation to that?

L: On the subject of your energy centers, no you will not be altering them to any great extent, it is more a matter of their functioning will be more fluid, more in alignment with each other, and this would likely result simply from individuals being more present and more aware of the functioning of their bodies. And as I just stated some energy centers will also be more active, particularly those which are involved with the subjective aspects of yourself.

Q: Which energy centers are those?

L: The ones involved with…, the ones you consider as the higher levels.

Q: Okay. Do you have anything else to add to that?

L: Not right now.

Q: Yeah I understand. Okay, let’s have a look here, I have a couple of things. How is Nuno doing?

L: He is well.

Q: Okay. Alright. Listening to your fabulous explanation about co-creation and recognizing the depths to how you are explaining that the painter changes the degree of sadness, for example, of one of the figures in front of him. Using your example, did I understand that correctly, that I can have, for example, my daughter could be, in my opinion, quite fuming and angry, and in her perception she would be, maybe a little moody, but the degrees are changing according to each person’s perception but there is sort of a correlation that is exact for example if she is not exactly fuming and angry but there is kind of a negative vibe coming from her. Or, she could be totally happy at the same time that I view her to be angry? Is that too farfetched, with the correlation?

L: No, it is not farfetched. You have complete freedom in how you reconfigure the expression of others and your experience of the other’s expression doesn’t necessarily have to involve an actual expression of the other individual.
For example, returning to the analogy of the painting, the artist could include into that painting an individual that is not actually present in the market but perhaps it is, let us say, a friend of his and he wishes to put his friend into the painting even though the friend is not present. And you have that flexibility with your perception as well. You can also reconfigure their physical actions, for example if, let us say, an individual were to attack you and this is not an experience that you are allowing for you are not expressing in that direction, in this case you would simply reconfigure that to some other expression or you may not even be aware of the other individual’s action. What I am saying here is that you have complete freedom in that.

Q: One moment please. We continue.

L: Very well, do you have any further questions on this?

Q: Okay, I would ask you in relation to how much a person is focused with you in that reality and you have said that it’s possible to even interact with someone who is disengaged, so basically it seems like there might be, if consciousness was poured into a cup, there could be varying degrees of people that would focused in different percentages with you in your reality. For example it could be that someone would be 100% focused with you and all of their actions and all of their interactions with you are on par, agreed. And someone else kind of has a quality experience where...I’m asking because sometimes I have a feeling that people are just not focused with me or I need to work to get their attention or that kind of thing, so is that true, what my impression is, that there is a kind of percentage, or a degree in which people pour their consciousness...or is it just either they are there or they’re not?

L: Your interactions with other individuals, when you engage with another individual’s interaction, what is occurring is that you are drawing from their energy, and in some cases you simply accept their expression as they actually did express themselves, in other cases you will alter it to some varying degree.

Q: Some people just feel like, like even if I see them, they’re not actually with their attention participating. Their image could be right in front of you but you have the feeling that actually they are off somewhere else, if that makes any sense.

L: I am understanding. This could be for different reasons. One possibility is that their intention is, as you say, elsewhere, they may not even be aware of your interactions with them. It may also be for the very simple reason that from their perspective your interaction with them is not so important to them at that moment. In all cases though your experience with other individuals is of your own choosing and from your perspective, that is from your perspective as a focus engaged in the action of perceiving, it is from within that perspective not possible to know exactly what the other individual is expressing or not. This is not to say that at other levels awareness this is not known to you, you can obtain that information. It is simply in your action of engaging this focus and your action of perception [this] limits you to an awareness of other individuals that is completely shaped by yourself, and within that context you cannot tell the difference.

Q: You know a deep understanding of that concept would make a person quite eager to move into the interconnectedness because what you are describing is a type of lone wolf type of existence.

L: Not exactly. What I am expressing is that your experience of the other individual is completely your own, however you can to whatever degree you wish tie yourself, or more precisely connect yourself with the individual in your interactions to a much stronger degree. And you do this frequently with others that have significance to you, as your children for example. With other individuals that are not so significant to you, you may have a tendency to not perceive their expression quite so literally. Those individuals that are more significant to you, you will naturally generate an importance and therefore draw to you more closely what their actual expression is.

Q: Yeah. It’s big stuff. (laughs). How would this affect the world once people recognized that we are all interconnected and therefore we are in the driver’s seat, so to speak, in relation to our interactions with others?

L: This view of your perception and how you generate your reality that I have been expressing is not all that new to your world, it has been expressed before, however it is quite an abstract concept for most people and to some degree it will remain so even with the shift in your consciousness. Individuals will be more aware of that to some extent, however you will not be moving collectively in a direction in which you fundamentally alter the way in which you experience your world and this refers back to my earlier comments in our discussion in that the fundamental structure and purpose of your dimension is not being changed. The greater awareness of the way in which your perception functions will be, shall we say, at the edges of awareness in that, similar to your case, you are aware of these concepts and you understand them and you apply them to some extent however it is not that you are going to significantly alter your interactions with other individuals because of your understanding of this.

Q: Right. That’s right, yes.

L: And that is what is occurring and will occur.

Q: Thank you. Nuno had a last question. Is that okay?
L: Yes, you may proceed.

Q: Great. So Nuno was asking if you would be willing to offer practical advice on how to generate the imagery that you want. Thank you.

L: I did begin to express that in our earlier discussion today.

Q: Is there anything that you want to add?

L: Give us a moment. Now I mentioned earlier about the influence of your beliefs and how important it is to recognize the ones you engage so you may have more choices. You may perhaps move in a direction of lessening the influence of the beliefs upon you, or what may be simpler in many cases is to flow with the belief and work with it so that you still accomplish what your intent is, but in a way that is in harmony with your beliefs. That is one aspect to consider when you want to move in a certain direction and then generate a certain experience. Another aspect to that is recognizing your motivation, your reason for wanting to generate that particular experience. And oftentimes you may find that what you actually want to experience may not be that particular objective outcome, it may be, and often is, a certain subjective gratification or a subjective feeling of accomplishment, or perhaps a creative expression. In other words, that particular objective you wish to accomplish is motivated perhaps by larger issues which are more subjective, such as your intent in your focus, and if you recognize this you offer to yourself more choices in which you may satisfy that.

Q: Interesting.

L: Are you understanding?

Q: Yes. Yes. You offer very clear information. Is there anything that you would be excited to share with us in directions that you have chosen to...obviously I have a sensation that you are bursting with ideas that you want to share. Is there anything that you want to begin with as a topic that you might develop futurely with us, in this conversation? Or should we leave it for another time?
L: I will not be exploring a different topic at this time, however one area I will be expressing on is that of technology and making some suggestions to you collectively, areas of exploration in that, that perhaps have been overlooked because of your previous narrower view on your physical world and your understanding of energy.

Q: Well I am sure that we are all looking forward to participating with those subjects in the future and so if there is nothing else I will thank you very much for this conversation and I will wish you goodbye.

L: Very well, I thank you for the interaction and wish you a good day.

Q: Thank you very much. Take care.